February 22nd 2007
Analyzing FRO
I love to analyze and research, and I like to help others. Here is a stock pick from theirry, a frequent commenter: “Have a look at FRO i would like to know if this fit your methodology ( that you have to explain ) thank you, thierry”.
So Thierry, here’s my analysis:
FRO had some decent looking setups the base on base would have worked out well, but I probably wouldn’t have taken the trade. The reason is the amount of overhead resistance. Typically the 50 and 200 day SMA will provide significant overhead resistance. Now, taking a look at FRO, the stock blew through the 50 and 200 day SMA’s, so Theirry, you would have made some points on this one. I personally would have looked for a trade with less risk. I try to have the moving averages underneath the price if I am going long and above the price if I am going short.
I guess the “bad” thing about the way I pick trades is that I will rarely get in at the beginning of a move. I almost always am picking up a few points off retracements. TIVO is a winner that is atypical of the trades I look for. Now that it’s probing its 200 day SMA, I’ve taken some profits because of the likelihood that it will bounce off the 200 day SMA. It was a higher risk trade because of it’s position relative to it’s moving average just like FRO.
If you like this post, then consider subscribing to my full feed RSS feed. You can also Subscribe to A Trade A Day by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
1 Comment »








thierry on 23 Feb 2007 at 7:59 pm #
HELLO JONATHAN
I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU EXPLAINED , I JUST WHEN TO LOOK AT THE CHART OF CMI THAT I SHORTED TWO TIMES , I DID NOT PAY ATTENTION ON THE 50 SMA AND 200 SMA …I GUESS I HAVE A TENDENCY TO BELIEVE AT THE NEWTOWN APPLE ( SORRY IF IT IS NOT THE RIGHT SPELLING )
MAYBE I WAS CONFIDENT ON THE NEWS ABOUT CMI …WELL I WAS LUCKY AND NOT TOO GREEDY …HAVE A GOOD WEEK END
THIERRY