Archive for October, 2007

October 31st 2007

5 Cognitive Biases that Ruined My Trading

I’m almost finished with Way of the Turtle by Curtis M. Faith. In the book, there’s a section on some of the cognitive biases that traders and investors experience. A cognitive bias, according to the book, is a “distortion in the way people perceive reality”. I thought it would be interesting to list my Top 5 and how I’m dealing with them.

1. Loss Aversion:
Simply stated, it is the preference for avoiding losses instead of acquiring gains. When I follow the rules of my system and lose $100, I feel the pain is more intense then if I had missed a trade that would have made me $100.

Where I have seen improvement is I would rather take a trade because I am following my rules and lose $100 then not take the trade because I ignored my rules and avoid losing the $100. Traders who are prone to loss aversion would rather ignore their rules and not lose $100 than follow their rules and lose $100.

The reason loss aversion is “bad” is that it causes the trader to violate their trading rules. Your trading rules are what give you the confidence that you will win over the long term. Trading rules are what give you an edge. When you ignore them, you’ve just thrown a huge monkey wrench into your viability. Ignoring your trading rules would indicate that you really don’t have confidence in what you are doing. Without a clear, unemotional decision making process for your trading activity(trading rules), you are gambling.9

2. Outcome bias
When I judge a trade based on how well the trade performed rather than how well I adhered to my system, that’s outcome bias. I struggled with this cognitive bias early on. When I had a string of losers I would begin to question the trading method I was using. It would cause me to flip flop methodologies which ultimately led to my 2nd demise. First it was CANSLIM style investing, then I hit a couple of losers and I was scalping futures, then trading gaps intraday. I ended up losing my second trading stake pretty quickly.

3. Recency bias
Recency bias is placing greater weight on current trading performance relative to previous trading performance. It goes hand in had with my outcome bias. When I was flip flopping methods, my current performance had far more weight in my decision making process than any success I had previously with other methods. I had made up my mind that if it wasn’t working now, it wasn’t any good. It was such a train wreck. I don’t think I write well enough to do it justice :)

4. Bandwagon effect
The Bandwagon effect, as Mr. Faith states in his book, is the tendency to believe things because many other people believe them. I would like to think I am a little more independent than this bias sounds. However, it’s important to be true to yourself. I know in the past, I have tried trading methods and taken stock picks because I’ve heard it mentioned by several sources. What really sucks is that these weren’t even trusted sources. I believed it because I heard it enough.

5. The Law of Small Numbers
Borrowing again from Way of the Turtle: This is “the tendency to draw unjustified conclusions from too little information”. How could I have switched trading methodologies so quickly when things weren’t working. I mean, I was switching the way I traded when the system didn’t work after a few days. What kind of indicator of performance is that? At most you would think I would have stayed with CANSLIM investing from the beginning. There’s decades of examples that imply this system is profitable. Not that I am advocating trading on the implications of a system’s past performance, but I had no experience in back testing at the time. Ultimately, the belief in the law of small numbers was just another nail in the coffin.

As I write this post, I get a pit in my stomach. If I had known about how important psychology is to trading successfully, I would be farther ahead, and would not have blown out twice.

However, experience is the best teacher. Without making all those mistakes, I never would have become the student of the market and of trading that I feel I have become.

How did I recover? I got a mentor, learned a system, and focused on trading that system as best as I could. I still grapple with these cognitive biases. I’m not a machine and being a discretionary trader doesn’t help.

I’ve learned to deal with my cognitive biases in three ways:
1. Focusing on being the best trader of my system that I can be.
2. I also my risk and reward in terms of R multiples. The helps because I no longer think of risk and reward in terms of dollars.
3. Trade longer time frames. The less I am in the market, the less these biases can impact me. I still day trade occasionally, but trading with a slightly longer time frame really helps.

Hopes this helps. If you haven’t read Way of the Turtle, I highly recommend it.

7 Comments »

October 30th 2007

How I use Trading Volume

If you need a technical definition of volume, you can find one here.

Volume, for me, is conviction. Volume ,placed in context with price movement, allows me to trade effectively. To measure the significance of volume, we need a baseline. I use a 30 day SMA of volume. What I am looking for is the % change relative to the 30 day SMA. My logic here is that 30 trading days of volume data should give me an idea of what is considered “normal” for a given stock.

There are 6 price and volume combinations that I look for:

2007-10-29-dow-volume-example.png

1. Price goes up, volume goes up.
This is indicative of a greater demand for the stock than supply. The greater the volume relative to the 30 day average, the greater the demand for the stock.

2. Price goes up, volume goes down.
Price would indicate that there is greater demand than supply for a stock, but volume does not confirm the move. I interpret this as just a lack of any real selling pressure with just enough buying pressure to make the price move up.

3. Price goes down, volume goes up.
Like situation 1, but instead we have a glut of sellers. There’s an increased supply of the stock because sellers are flooding the market with shares.

4. Price goes down, volume goes down.
The inverse of number 2. The selling pressure as abated, but there is little , or at least, not enough buying pressure.

5. Price goes sideways, volume goes up.
Depending on the pattern that is formed, the type of action can mean a couple of things. In the case of a Hammer, the stock may be signaling a change in trend. In the case of spinning top-like pattern, you’re probably seeing churn.

6. Price goes sideways, volume goes down.
Lack of conviction either way. When price is a NR7 or NR4, this can be indicative of a pending move.

One final word on volume. Most of the methods I employ are based on extremes. Volume is no exception. I want to see a 50% or more change in volume on the patterns I trade. Hammers should bounce of a spike in volume. The same is true for Marubozu.

Volume is an edge. Don’t ignore it.

15 Comments »

October 29th 2007

IBM Trading Idea

I’m in a bit of a holding pattern when it comes to long trades. I see a lot of good counter-trend longs that I could talk about. I’ll give you a hint. If you read my How to trade Hammers article and do a quick scan, you’ll see what I’m talking about.

My scans are also turning up several good shorting opportunities. Case in point: IBM

2007-10-28-ibm.png

IBM has broken through its 50 SMA, typically a significant support level, and has begun to consolidate. This consolidation is a text book bear flag. Volume has died down after the initial move downward and now we’re just waiting for a break of the 111.00 area to initiate a new short.

This is a very text book pattern. Trade with the trend, if the Dow rallies and IBM breaks 111, the trade may not work out as well. While the trade is textbook, there’s still risk. I like IBM under 111.

See you Tomorrow!

No Comments yet »

October 28th 2007

Trading Ideas Update

It’s Sunday which of course means it’s time to review open trades featured on this site as well as any positions that were closed this week.

The AMTD trade is consolidating above its 50 SMA.

The AGU trade is sitting close to 2.5R.

The KGC trade is now around 2.5R.

The SINA trade is at about 1R for me.

The GSOL trade is at 1R.

Longs seem to be working but barely. Look at the DOW and COMPQ I can’t stop think the market will turn lower. I’m having a battle internally. I want to take my profits on my longs and start shorting.

But that’s not my method. My trades need to stop themselves out. Letting the market dictate your action is very important for long term profitability. I’ve closed my longs before based on “fear” that the market was headed lower, only to have the market keep going higher.

See you Monday!

No Comments yet »

October 27th 2007

Something Completely Different

When I was 13 years old, I used to love to watch the Ultimate Warrior in the WWF. This video is so bizarre, It almost hurts to watch it.

1 Comment »

Next »