<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trading Bases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/</link>
	<description>A Source for Trading Ideas.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-7722</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-7722</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jonathan,

I think this helped. I was looking for a resistance on a wider timeframe. It makes perfect sense now. But in essence, it seems like a base has to be near a recent high for it to be considered at a local high, no?

Happy Holidays! Your blog and help are awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jonathan,</p>
<p>I think this helped. I was looking for a resistance on a wider timeframe. It makes perfect sense now. But in essence, it seems like a base has to be near a recent high for it to be considered at a local high, no?</p>
<p>Happy Holidays! Your blog and help are awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

The way I determine support and resistance is as follows:

 When Price is unable to break above/below a certain price that's support or resistance. The more times price touches this "area". The more powerful the support/resistance is thought to be. Also, Support/resistance on larger time frames are thought to be more powerful than smaller time frames.

You can also use tools like pivots points and whole numbers, but in general if price can't get above/below a certain area than there must be support/resistance there.

In the case of the IBM example, there was definitely resistance at the 108 area. On 5/21 IBM stopped at the 108 level and then on 5/31 it tried again, but couldn't even make it back to 108 area.

IBM broke through resistance on 7/6 and for the following six trading days, printed a tight, horizontal price pattern(base). The resistance at 108 had now become support. Note that price never broke the 108 area. I saw the base as a low risk opportunity should it break out.

Remember that support and resistance are zones and they are also somewhat subjective. After looking at enough charts you start to see where prices stall. What constitutes are break of support/resistance? Again very subjective and should be the subject of another post.

Hope this helps. Let me know if it didn't I can talk more about support and resistance in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>The way I determine support and resistance is as follows:</p>
<p> When Price is unable to break above/below a certain price that&#8217;s support or resistance. The more times price touches this &#8220;area&#8221;. The more powerful the support/resistance is thought to be. Also, Support/resistance on larger time frames are thought to be more powerful than smaller time frames.</p>
<p>You can also use tools like pivots points and whole numbers, but in general if price can&#8217;t get above/below a certain area than there must be support/resistance there.</p>
<p>In the case of the IBM example, there was definitely resistance at the 108 area. On 5/21 IBM stopped at the 108 level and then on 5/31 it tried again, but couldn&#8217;t even make it back to 108 area.</p>
<p>IBM broke through resistance on 7/6 and for the following six trading days, printed a tight, horizontal price pattern(base). The resistance at 108 had now become support. Note that price never broke the 108 area. I saw the base as a low risk opportunity should it break out.</p>
<p>Remember that support and resistance are zones and they are also somewhat subjective. After looking at enough charts you start to see where prices stall. What constitutes are break of support/resistance? Again very subjective and should be the subject of another post.</p>
<p>Hope this helps. Let me know if it didn&#8217;t I can talk more about support and resistance in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-6707</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-6707</guid>
		<description>I'm also fairly new and I really enjoy reading your posts. Frankly, my biggest problem it seems like (and it might sound dumb), is that I can't figure out how to consistently evaluate the support and resistance.

For example, you used the IBM example and in a good setup, the resistance should be far above but when I look at the IBM chart for the year, it seems like, back in July, we were right there underneath the resistance, no?

Evidently, I'm not seeing something obvious :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also fairly new and I really enjoy reading your posts. Frankly, my biggest problem it seems like (and it might sound dumb), is that I can&#8217;t figure out how to consistently evaluate the support and resistance.</p>
<p>For example, you used the IBM example and in a good setup, the resistance should be far above but when I look at the IBM chart for the year, it seems like, back in July, we were right there underneath the resistance, no?</p>
<p>Evidently, I&#8217;m not seeing something obvious <img src='http://www.atradeaday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5881</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5881</guid>
		<description>@NoGreedNoFear Thanks for the complement!

@JasonR I look at declining volume and no price movement as lack of conviction. If you look at the context of a base, declining volume is indicative of a continuation of the previous move. For an up move, declining volume in a base means that despite the pause in stock price, sellers were unable or unwilling to knock the price down. Buyers didn't need to exert any activity to keep the stock price flat. 

Whether the preceding move was up or down, when looking at a base, you want to keep in mind that volume must explode when price finally breaks out.

If volume is heavy inside of a base, that is indicative of churn (lots of buying and selling with no price movement either way). I would rather buyers exhaust their buying power when the stock is rocketing up, not before it even breaks out. Could price break out and continue higher? Sure, but keep in mind you want to trade stocks with the best chance for success. Volume is another filter I put on when evaluating potential trades.

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NoGreedNoFear Thanks for the complement!</p>
<p>@JasonR I look at declining volume and no price movement as lack of conviction. If you look at the context of a base, declining volume is indicative of a continuation of the previous move. For an up move, declining volume in a base means that despite the pause in stock price, sellers were unable or unwilling to knock the price down. Buyers didn&#8217;t need to exert any activity to keep the stock price flat. </p>
<p>Whether the preceding move was up or down, when looking at a base, you want to keep in mind that volume must explode when price finally breaks out.</p>
<p>If volume is heavy inside of a base, that is indicative of churn (lots of buying and selling with no price movement either way). I would rather buyers exhaust their buying power when the stock is rocketing up, not before it even breaks out. Could price break out and continue higher? Sure, but keep in mind you want to trade stocks with the best chance for success. Volume is another filter I put on when evaluating potential trades.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonR</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5834</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5834</guid>
		<description>I'm still a little bit of a newbie to this whole trading thing, but have enjoyed your posts and found much food for thought here :-). I hope you don't mind me asking what may be a silly question. Might a base with falling volume also indicate the possibility of a reversal? I would think this is especially likely after an extreme like you mention. Am I off base here (hehe), or are there some things to avoid that might signify a reversal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still a little bit of a newbie to this whole trading thing, but have enjoyed your posts and found much food for thought here :-). I hope you don&#8217;t mind me asking what may be a silly question. Might a base with falling volume also indicate the possibility of a reversal? I would think this is especially likely after an extreme like you mention. Am I off base here (hehe), or are there some things to avoid that might signify a reversal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoGreedNoFear</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5756</link>
		<dc:creator>NoGreedNoFear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5756</guid>
		<description>Great start to your new series. Looking forward to Part 2.

Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great start to your new series. Looking forward to Part 2.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5755</guid>
		<description>@HPT Thanks. I sure will.

@Bubs Thanks again!

@Will Oh crap. There goes my thunder. Actually I haven't been by HCPG, but I'll check them out. Thanks for the add!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HPT Thanks. I sure will.</p>
<p>@Bubs Thanks again!</p>
<p>@Will Oh crap. There goes my thunder. Actually I haven&#8217;t been by HCPG, but I&#8217;ll check them out. Thanks for the add!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Kellner</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5749</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Kellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5749</guid>
		<description>Good post.  Have you read HCPG blog?   They wrote about a lot of these concepts last year, merging time frames, support and resistance, and of course their base and break pattern.  They don't seem to be blogging much this year anymore.  

I'll def add you to my feed.  Looking forward to more posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  Have you read HCPG blog?   They wrote about a lot of these concepts last year, merging time frames, support and resistance, and of course their base and break pattern.  They don&#8217;t seem to be blogging much this year anymore.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll def add you to my feed.  Looking forward to more posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubs</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5717</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5717</guid>
		<description>Great post also looking forward to the future posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post also looking forward to the future posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HPT</title>
		<link>http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5708</link>
		<dc:creator>HPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atradeaday.com/2007/12/12/trading-bases/#comment-5708</guid>
		<description>Look forward to seeing your posts on setups, make sure you make a link to these setups on your sidebar for future use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look forward to seeing your posts on setups, make sure you make a link to these setups on your sidebar for future use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
